Why Gender-Based Violence Persists Despite Increased Awareness
- Judith Nnakee

- 1 day ago
- 4 min read

Why Gender-Based Violence Persists Despite Increased Awareness in Nigeria
Gender-based violence (GBV) is no longer a hidden issue in Nigeria. It is discussed in the media, addressed in public campaigns and acknowledged in policy conversations. There is more information available than ever before and more people understand what constitutes abuse, harassment and exploitation.
Despite this increased awareness, the level of violence has not declined in a significant or consistent way. Reports continue to emerge across different regions, affecting individuals across age groups and social classes. This situation points to a deeper problem. Awareness has improved knowledge, but it has not changed the conditions that allow gender-based violence to persist.
To understand why this gap exists, it is necessary to look beyond awareness and examine the structural, social and institutional factors that sustain the problem.
The Gap Between Law and Enforcement
Nigeria has legal frameworks designed to address gender-based violence. Laws exist to criminalize domestic violence, sexual assault and other related offences. However, the presence of laws does not automatically translate into protection.
Many cases are not handled with the level of urgency or professionalism required. Victims may encounter delays when reporting incidents and investigations are sometimes incomplete or poorly conducted. In some situations, there is pressure to resolve cases outside the formal legal system, even when the offence is serious.
When legal processes are unreliable, the system loses credibility. Offenders may not fear consequences and victims may conclude that reporting will not lead to justice. This weakens the overall impact of existing laws and allows harmful behavior to continue.
The Influence of Social and Cultural Norms
Social attitudes play a central role in shaping responses to gender-based violence. In many communities, there are deeply rooted beliefs about gender roles, authority, and family structure. These beliefs can influence how violence is interpreted and whether it is challenged.
In some cases, harmful actions are minimized or redefined as discipline or conflict. There may be an expectation that personal or family issues should not be exposed to external authorities. Victims can be encouraged to remain in harmful situations in order to preserve family reputation or social stability.
These norms do not operate in isolation. They affect how individuals respond, how communities react, and how institutions prioritize cases. As long as these attitudes remain largely unchallenged, awareness campaigns alone cannot produce meaningful change.
Underreporting and the Role of Stigma
A significant proportion of gender-based violence cases are never formally reported. Social stigma continues to discourage victims from coming forward. The fear of being judged, disbelieved or publicly exposed can outweigh the perceived benefits of reporting.
In many situations, victims are concerned about how disclosure will affect their personal relationships, family standing or future opportunities. The lack of confidentiality in some reporting processes further increases this risk.
Underreporting creates a distorted picture of the problem. It reduces the pressure on institutions to respond effectively and limits the availability of accurate data for policy decisions. As a result, the scale of gender-based violence is often underestimated, and responses remain inadequate.
Economic Constraints and Dependence
Economic factors are a critical but often overlooked aspect of gender-based violence. Financial dependence can make it extremely difficult for victims to leave abusive environments. When an individual relies on an abuser for housing, income, or basic survival, the decision to leave involves significant risk.
Even when a victim is aware of available support services, access may be limited. Shelters are not widely available and alternative housing options may be unaffordable. Employment opportunities may also be restricted, especially for individuals with limited resources or support networks.
This economic reality means that awareness alone does not provide a viable path to safety. Without financial independence or external support, many victims remain in situations they recognize as harmful.
Weak and Inaccessible Support Systems
Effective response to gender-based violence requires more than legal action. It depends on a network of support services, including healthcare, legal aid, counseling and safe accommodation. In many parts of Nigeria, these systems are either limited or difficult to access.
Where services exist, they may be underfunded, understaffed or concentrated in urban areas, leaving rural populations with fewer options. The process of accessing support can also be complex, requiring multiple steps that discourage follow-through.
Without strong institutional support, victims are left to manage the consequences of violence with limited assistance. This reduces the likelihood of reporting and increases the long-term impact of abuse.
The Role of Media and Public Discourse
Media coverage has contributed to increased awareness of gender-based violence, but it has limitations. Reporting often focuses on extreme or high-profile cases, while everyday incidents receive less attention. There is also limited follow-up on reported cases, which reduces accountability.
In some instances, coverage lacks context, focusing on the event rather than the systemic issues behind it. This can lead to temporary public reaction without sustained engagement or policy change.
For media to have a stronger impact, coverage needs to be consistent, detailed, and focused on both prevention and accountability. Without this, awareness remains fragmented and short-lived.
Limitations of Awareness Campaigns
Awareness campaigns are an important part of the response to gender-based violence, but they are often designed as short-term interventions. They may be active during specific periods or events, after which public attention declines.
Sustained change requires long-term strategies that go beyond information sharing. This includes continuous education, integration into school curricula, workplace policies and community-based programs that address behavior and accountability.
When awareness efforts are not supported by structural changes, their impact remains limited. They increase visibility but do not alter the underlying conditions that enable violence.
Gender-based violence persists in Nigeria not because of a lack of awareness, but because of gaps in enforcement, social attitudes, economic conditions and institutional support. Awareness has made the issue more visible, but it has not resolved the factors that sustain it.
Addressing gender-based violence requires a coordinated approach that combines legal accountability, cultural change, economic empowerment and accessible support systems. Without these elements working together, progress will remain limited.
Reducing gender-based violence is not a matter of increasing awareness alone. It requires consistent action, effective institutions and a willingness to confront the structures that allow the problem to continue.




Comments